algentis
← All guides
Basics

Crypto Futures Maker vs Taker Fees Explained with Examples

Crypto futures maker vs taker fees depend on how your order fills. Learn to calculate entry and exit costs and account for funding and slippage.

22 Oct 2026 · 5 min read · Algentis

A futures fee is charged when an order fills, but the rate depends on how it fills. A maker order adds an offer to the order book for someone else to trade against. A taker order trades against an offer already there. That difference can change the cost of both entering and leaving a position. (mexc.com)

What makes an order a maker or taker?

Suppose the best available BTC perpetual sell offer is 50,010 USDT. If you place a buy limit order at 50,000 and it waits on the book, any later fill against that resting order is a maker fill. If you place a market buy, you take an available offer and receive a taker fill.

A limit order is not automatically a maker order. A buy limit set at 50,010 or higher may match an existing sell offer immediately. It can therefore pay the taker rate. An order can also fill in parts, with fees determined by what happened to each filled part. Check the execution record rather than judging by the order type alone. (support.binance.us)

A post-only limit order prevents an immediate taker fill. On MEXC, it is canceled if it would match an existing order right away. That protects maker status, not execution: the order may sit unfilled while price moves away. (mexc.com)

How to calculate the fee on a futures trade

For a USDT perpetual, a useful estimate is filled position value × applicable fee rate. Calculate entry and exit separately. If price changes, the value of the position at exit—and thus its fee—can differ from its value at entry. MEXC’s calculation guide uses fill price, contract quantity, contract size and the applicable maker or taker rate. (mexc.com)

Here is a hypothetical comparison, not a quote of your MEXC account’s rates. Assume a 5,000 USDT position, a 0.01% maker rate and a 0.04% taker rate. To isolate fees, assume the position value is still 5,000 USDT when it closes:

  • Maker entry: 5,000 × 0.01% = 0.50 USDT.
  • Taker entry: 5,000 × 0.04% = 2.00 USDT.
  • Maker entry and maker exit: 1.00 USDT in trading fees.
  • Taker entry and taker exit: 4.00 USDT in trading fees.
  • Maker entry and taker exit: 2.50 USDT in trading fees.

The last case is common in planning: you may be willing to wait for an entry but need a prompt exit if your stop is triggered. Do not budget for a maker-rate stop simply because you hope to close with a limit order.

Fees are based on position value, not just the margin you put up. At 10× leverage, a 5,000 USDT position might begin with roughly 500 USDT of initial margin. In the example, a 2 USDT taker fee on one side is 0.4% of that 500 USDT, even though its stated rate is 0.04% of position value. Leverage does not change the fee formula; it makes costs and price moves larger relative to your margin. (mexc.com)

Why the lowest fee is not always the cheapest trade

A maker order can save a stated fee yet fail to fill at the price your plan requires. A market order prioritizes execution but can cross the bid–ask spread and suffer slippage, particularly when available orders are thin or price is moving fast. Those are trading costs even though they are not listed as maker or taker fees. (mexc.com)

Imagine the 5,000 USDT position above. The hypothetical maker–taker fee difference is 1.50 USDT per side. If waiting for a maker entry causes you to chase a price 0.10% worse, that difference in entry price is about 5 USDT on the same position—more than the fee saved. Conversely, if your planned price never trades, the sensible outcome may be no position at all, not a rushed market entry. Compare the total execution cost with the price and risk specified in your trade plan.

Exit decisions deserve extra care. MEXC warns that a post-only order is unsuitable when you must close urgently: it may be canceled or remain unfilled. A stop-loss limits risk only if its resulting order executes; fast markets can produce a worse fill than the trigger price. (mexc.com)

Risk reminder: Leveraged perpetuals can lose money rapidly, and neither a low fee nor a stop trigger guarantees your intended exit price.

Check the rate—and separate fees from funding

There is no universal maker or taker rate for crypto futures. On MEXC, rates can vary by contract, account or region, promotions, and how the order is submitted. Its announced futures API schedule is separate from the web and app schedule. Check the rate applicable to your contract and account before trading, then check the actual charge in your fill history. Do not apply a headline zero-fee offer to every order. (mexc.com)

Funding is a separate calculation. Perpetual positions held at a funding settlement may pay or receive an amount based on position value and the funding rate. MEXC’s preset schedule is every eight hours at 00:00, 08:00 and 16:00 UTC, but it can adjust a contract’s interval, so check that contract’s displayed time. At a hypothetical positive funding rate of 0.01%, a 5,000 USDT long held through one settlement would pay about 0.50 USDT; a corresponding short would receive it. Funding rates can change before settlement. (mexc.com)

Before placing a trade, write down the expected entry fee, a realistic exit fee, possible funding settlements, and the price at which the trade idea is invalid. Then size the position against that full risk—not against the attractive-looking maker rate alone.

How Algentis uses this

Algentis trades MEXC USDT perpetual futures and signals only when its market-structure, macro-context and AI checks align. Its hard-coded risk rules require a structure-based stop-loss, cap concurrent positions and include a daily-loss circuit breaker; those controls matter more than trying to save a small fee on an exit that needs to happen promptly.

Let the agent do the watching.

Algentis applies these rules around the clock and only signals when a setup passes all of them.